Lead Developer, Stardock Entertainment
Published on October 15, 2003 By CariElf In PC Gaming
I've always been against first person shooters for two reasons:

1) It's a game devoted to violence. There is no other purpose to play a FPS other than to wreak havoc.
2) The few times I tried playing the original Castle Wolfenstein at my cousins' house, I sucked. Not surprising, since I hadn't had any practice.

The guys here at work all like to play FPSs, and they started playing them at lunch or after hours on the LAN. They asked if I wanted to play, but I wasn't really interested. But I felt left out. Now, I could have loaded up a strategy game or a RPG, but what I was really missing was the camaraderie. So when Halo came out for the PC, I stood and watched over some of their shoulders while they played. I was impressed by the graphics. Since I haven't ever played any other FPSs, I can't compare the graphics, but I like how Halo looks. Since I knew that the guys were having a lot of fun, I got off my soapbox and installed Halo on my machine.

I have to say, I have a lot of fun. There's something satisfying about running people over with a warthog, or sending them flying with a plasma grenade. But I imagine that it wouldn't be half as fun against AI players. The laughter and cries of dismay from the other players are something that you can't replicate in a bot game. And AI teammates can't strategize with you.

So I've pretty much given up my disapproval of FPSs. It's a game. It's not real. They have ratings just like movies, so that parents can actually be parents and decide if they want their kids playing it. Games are not the problem. Hands off parents are.

Comments
on Oct 15, 2003
Sure. It's not a bad game. But DOOM is a fun game too, even today.

The problem with Halo is that it's been eclipsed by game mechanics by other games. The ONLY thing special about Halo is that is has vehcicles. And even there, Battlefield 1942 has those and does them better.

I can't think of a single aspect of Halo that isn't done better in other games. Its graphics aren't great. It's performance is terrible given its simplistic visuals. Its weapons are awful (you have to go all the way back to 1997 to Quake to find a game with comparatively bad weapons).

If you want to play something that is more fun, Counterstrike is much more fun. Battlefield 1942 is more fun. Even UT2003 is more fun.
on Oct 22, 2003
Ah...DOOM.....I love that game. That was always so fun. And I love the noises that the monsters make. Nothing better than sitting in a pitch black room playing Doom with headphones on. Yeah, that game is still fun!

Cari, you haven't posted lately. Get on here and write something!